At a glance
- Provider
- NTT Communications
- Category
- Global Telecom
- Country/Region
- Global
- Known ASNs
- AS2914, AS4713
NTT Communications is one of the major Global Telecom providers tracked in this directory, with operations in Global. This profile page covers NTT Communications's primary ASN references (AS2914, AS4713), common coverage locations, and the diagnostic context most useful when an IP lookup, ASN result, or traceroute attributes a public address to NTT Communications. Use it as a starting point for ASN, WHOIS, and reverse DNS validation rather than as a standalone proof of identity or location.
Global transit and backbone providers usually describe how traffic is transported across networks, not who the final end user is.
NTT can represent enterprise carriage, backbone transport, or peering context, which means the observed ASN family is more important than the brand name alone.
Start with IP to ASN mapping, then verify reverse DNS and WHOIS ownership. For email and abuse workflows, add blacklist checks to assess IP reputation signals around NTT Communications traffic.
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation (NTT) is the Japanese telecommunications conglomerate that operates Japan's largest domestic fixed and mobile networks alongside one of the largest international IP backbone businesses in the world. NTT was the state-owned Japanese telecommunications monopoly until it was partially privatized in 1985 and progressively restructured into a holding company with several operating subsidiaries: NTT East and NTT West (Japanese domestic fixed-line operators), NTT DOCOMO (the dominant Japanese mobile carrier), NTT DATA (IT services), and NTT Communications (international and enterprise data services).
The international IP backbone business has gone through several internal-rebranding cycles. NTT Communications operated the global IP network for many years, then in 2019 was restructured into NTT Ltd as part of a global integration of the group's data-services subsidiaries, and more recently in 2022 the international operations were further consolidated under NTT DATA. For attribution purposes the corporate brand on the network has evolved through "NTT Communications," "NTT Ltd," and the current "NTT DATA," but the underlying autonomous system identity has remained stable.
NTT's primary backbone autonomous system is AS2914, branded as the NTT Global IP Network (GIN). The ASN was originally registered to Verio Inc., a US-based ISP and hosting company that NTT acquired in 2000. Verio's IP backbone and transit business became the foundation of NTT's international IP-services arm, and AS2914 was retained through the rebrand. Today AS2914 is one of the recognized Tier 1 backbones globally, with a customer cone and IPv4-prefix count that consistently rank in the top tier of the CAIDA AS-rank metric.
The brand history matters for attribution because older WHOIS records, hostname patterns, and third-party geolocation databases occasionally still reference Verio. The legacy is essentially transparent at the network level — packet forwarding and customer-cone structure follow current NTT operations — but the Verio terminology can surface in historical traceroutes and in documentation written before the rebrand.
Among Tier 1 backbones, NTT GIN has historically been the strongest in Asia-Pacific routing, reflecting NTT's Japanese home market and the long-standing investments in submarine cable capacity linking Japan to North America, Southeast Asia, and Australia. The Asia-Pacific advantage is structural: Japan is one of the global internet's most important interconnection hubs, and NTT's domestic position in Japan feeds directly into AS2914's regional reach. Customers needing strong Tokyo, Singapore, Hong Kong, or Sydney routing performance commonly select AS2914 as one of their primary transit options.
The European and North American footprints are also substantial but face stronger competition from US-centric backbones (Cogent, Lumen, GTT) and from Telia/Arelion in Europe. NTT's North American points-of-presence include the major carrier hotels (60 Hudson in New York, One Wilshire in Los Angeles, Equinix Ashburn, etc.) and Western European hubs in London, Frankfurt, Amsterdam, and Paris. The Latin American presence is more limited and typically relies on partner interconnection rather than wholly-owned infrastructure.
NTT GIN backbone-router hostnames follow a distinctive convention on the gin.ntt.net domain. Router interfaces typically resolve to names in the form ae-X.r10.tokyjp05.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net or ae-X.rN.londen03.uk.bb.gin.ntt.net, encoding the interface, router identifier, city code, and country in a structured pattern. City-code abbreviations (such as tokyjp, frnkge, londen, nycmny) are commonly four to six characters and uniquely identify the metro market the router sits in.
For trace and attribution analysis the gin.ntt.net signature is one of the cleanest Tier 1 backbone identifiers available from public data. A traceroute that passes through a sequence of gin.ntt.net hops can be read directly for the inter-city path, which is useful for diagnosing cross-region routing decisions without access to private operator BGP data. Customer-issued IP space announced through AS2914 does not typically use gin.ntt.net hostnames — the customer manages its own reverse DNS — so the PTR signature is specific to NTT-owned infrastructure rather than to downstream-customer space.
NTT DOCOMO is the NTT group's Japanese mobile carrier and one of the largest mobile operators in the world by subscriber count. DOCOMO operates an independent ASN portfolio for its Japanese mobile data network and is essentially separate from AS2914 international IP services. The attribution implication is significant: an IP attributed to "NTT" might be either AS2914 GIN (international backbone and enterprise transit) or one of the DOCOMO Japanese mobile ASNs (residential and consumer mobile in Japan), and the two carry fundamentally different traffic populations.
For Japanese consumer attribution NTT East and NTT West (the regional fixed-line operators) also operate their own ASN portfolios that are distinct from AS2914. The full NTT group ASN landscape is more complex than the single "NTT" brand suggests, and resolving an IP to the correct operating subsidiary requires looking at the specific ASN rather than relying on brand-level attribution.
NTT GIN has historically maintained an open peering policy with relatively standard technical requirements compared to Cogent's stricter posture. The result has been broad settlement-free interconnection with most major backbones, content delivery networks, and large eyeball networks across all major regions. NTT has not been involved in the high-profile peering disputes that have characterized Cogent's relationships with other Tier 1 operators, and AS2914 generally enjoys broad reachability parity across IPv4 and IPv6.
The peering posture is one of the reasons hyperscale content companies frequently include AS2914 as one of their transit options or direct-peer relationships. Stable, predictable peering relationships make AS2914 a low-risk choice for traffic engineering in mixed-vendor transit portfolios, and the operational profile has remained consistent through the corporate restructuring rounds of 2019 and 2022.
IPv6 deployment on AS2914 is comprehensive and long-standing. NTT was one of the earlier Tier 1 operators to deploy native IPv6 across its backbone and to support IPv6 BGP transit for wholesale customers, with native IPv6 paths across most of its long-haul network for many years. The IPv6 routing-table coverage on AS2914 is essentially complete relative to the IPv4 network, with no significant IPv4-versus-IPv6 reachability asymmetries of the kind that complicate Cogent's IPv6 path behavior.
For wholesale customers selecting AS2914 as a transit provider, the dual-stack baseline is one of the more reliable in the Tier 1 market. IPv6 transit through NTT does not require special engineering accommodations relative to IPv4, which is one of the reasons AS2914 is frequently selected by content providers prioritizing IPv6-ready interconnection. Pair with an ASN lookup when verifying that a given path actually traverses AS2914 rather than a downstream customer of AS2914.
As with any Tier 1 backbone, the bulk of AS2914 attribution issues stem from downstream-customer IP space being labeled at the upstream-backbone level. NTT GIN announces thousands of customer prefixes belonging to regional ISPs, hosting providers, content companies, and enterprise corporate networks across all major regions. The upstream "NTT" attribution is correct at the BGP level but rarely identifies the operational owner of the specific prefix.
The correct attribution workflow for any AS2914-tagged IP is to consult prefix-level WHOIS to identify the downstream customer actually responsible for the IP space. For abuse complaints, the prefix-level abuse contact produces faster and more relevant response than contacting NTT directly. NTT's network operations center will redirect non-backbone- specific complaints back to the downstream-customer abuse contact identified in prefix WHOIS.
Alongside the wholesale-transit business, NTT's international arm sells managed enterprise data and cloud services to multinational corporate customers. The product portfolio spans managed wide-area network services, hosted private cloud, cybersecurity managed-detection-and-response, and contact-center integration services. These are corporate customer relationships rather than consumer subscriptions, and the IP attribution on managed-service IPs typically points at the corporate customer rather than at consumer behavior. The product positioning sits somewhere between Equinix-style colocation, IBM-style managed IT, and a Tier 1 wholesale-transit operator, making NTT one of the more broadly-scoped enterprise-network vendors globally.
For attribution work the enterprise side of the business means a meaningful share of AS2914 IPs are dedicated managed-service circuits for corporate customers, not generic transit. RIPE and ARIN WHOIS records on enterprise blocks commonly identify the corporate customer where contractually disclosed, or reference NTT DATA generically where customer identity is protected. Behavior originating from such managed-corporate IPs reflects the customer's operations rather than NTT's, and treating it as backbone or consumer traffic produces misleading attribution.
NTT's Asia-Pacific routing strength rests on substantial investments in submarine cable systems linking Japan to North America (PC-1, JUS, FASTER consortium participation), Southeast Asia (APG, SJC, ASE), and Australia (JGA consortium). Several of these cables are partly owned by NTT and partly by consortium partners including hyperscale cloud providers, regional telcos, and Western backbone operators. The diversity of ownership reflects how submarine-cable economics have shifted in the 2010s and 2020s toward consortium financing rather than single-operator capital projects.
From an attribution standpoint the submarine footprint means AS2914 paths through Asia tend to have low latency and high capacity headroom between Japan and other Asia-Pacific markets, and between Asia and the US West Coast. Performance diagnostics that show a Tokyo-to-Los-Angeles or Tokyo-to-Singapore path through AS2914 typically reflect direct submarine-cable routing rather than indirect transit through intermediate networks. This is a feature when designing latency-sensitive Asia-Pacific connectivity but produces no consumer-behavior signal — it is a property of the backbone, not of any user riding it.
Several attribution traps recur with AS2914 IPs. First, the "NTT" label can refer to several distinct NTT-group operating subsidiaries (GIN international backbone, DOCOMO Japanese mobile, NTT East and NTT West fixed-line, NTT DATA IT services), each with its own ASN portfolio and its own attribution semantics. Brand-level confusion between these subsidiaries is one of the recurring sources of NTT-IP attribution error. Second, AS2914's downstream-customer cone is large, and the upstream-backbone label rarely identifies the operational owner of a specific prefix.
Third, the corporate rebrand history (Verio in early WHOIS records, NTT Communications, then NTT Ltd, now NTT DATA) means historical attribution data may reference defunct corporate identities even where the underlying network has remained stable. Fourth, NTT is a backbone and enterprise-transit operator, not a consumer ISP outside Japan, so consumer-behavior assumptions on AS2914 IPs outside Japan are starting from a wrong premise. Fifth, the Asia-Pacific path-engineering advantage means that traffic from a North American or European source destined for Asia commonly traverses AS2914, which can be misinterpreted as the source or destination being NTT-affiliated when it merely reflects transit selection.
NTT is a Japanese telecommunications conglomerate operating one of the largest international IP backbones globally through AS2914 (the NTT Global IP Network, GIN). The backbone business originated with the 2000 Verio acquisition and has been progressively rebranded through NTT Communications, NTT Ltd, and now NTT DATA without changing the underlying network identity. The gin.ntt.net PTR domain identifies NTT-owned backbone routers with structured city-code hostnames.
Asia-Pacific routing performance is the strongest regional positioning for AS2914 and reflects NTT's Japanese home-market presence and extensive submarine-cable investments. IPv6 deployment is comprehensive and free of the IPv4-versus-IPv6 reachability asymmetries that complicate some other Tier 1 operators. For per-IP attribution on AS2914-tagged ranges, pair an ASN lookup with a WHOIS lookup at the prefix level to identify the actual downstream operator behind an NTT-announced IP rather than treating the backbone label as the operational owner.
Within Japan itself, NTT's combined position (DOCOMO mobile, NTT East and NTT West fixed-line, and NTT Communications enterprise) covers most of the Japanese consumer and corporate connectivity market. For Japanese-domestic attribution questions the relevant operator subsidiary depends on the access type — DOCOMO for mobile, NTT East or NTT West for fixed-line, NTT enterprise for managed corporate services — and the AS2914 international backbone is rarely the right answer for Japanese consumer activity. Resolve the ASN first; the brand label alone is ambiguous because NTT branding spans so many operating subsidiaries with distinct network footprints. The corporate-rebrand sequence from NTT Communications to NTT Ltd to NTT DATA has not changed the operational identity of AS2914 but does mean that documentation, billing, and regulatory filings may reference different NTT entities depending on the year a record was produced — treat the ASN as the durable identifier rather than the corporate brand.